Air Quality and Climate Change
Bardekjian, A. & Puric-Mladenovic, D. (2025). Air Quality and Climate Change. In Growing Green Cities: A Practical Guide to Urban Forestry in Canada. Tree Canada. Retrieved from Tree Canada: https://treecanada.ca/urban-forestry-guide/air-quality-and-climate-change/

Highlights
Urban forests and air quality
Trees purify the air by trapping and filtering pollutants like nitrogen, sulphur, and carbon dioxide.
Carbon sequestration
Urban trees help offset significant greenhouse gas emissions through carbon dioxide sequestration.
Management and planning
Proper management, urban planning, and careful tree species selection are essential to maximizing air quality and climate benefits.
Targeted planting areas
Tree planting in heat-prone, high-traffic, and low-canopy areas should be prioritized to improve air quality.
Urban forests, providing multiple ecosystem services, offer a natural and sustainable solution for improving the environmental quality of urban areas through air purification, temperature regulation, and carbon sequestration. Trees, individually and collectively as part of urban forests, play a crucial role in enhancing air quality by filtering pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulphur dioxide (SO2). By absorbing these pollutants, trees metabolize and convert them into less harmful substances. They also trap particulate matter (PM) on their leaves, needles, and bark, effectively reducing their concentrations in the air. Research by Nowak et al. (2018) has shown that urban forests in Canada remove substantial amounts of air pollutants annually, leading to significant improvements in air quality and co-benefiting public health. An urban tree can absorb anywhere between 10 and 40 kg of CO2 each year and can intercept up to 4.5 kg of pollutants such as NO2, SO2, dust, soot, and smoke (EcoTree, 2024; Vallet, 2005; Greener Seasons, 2022).
Urban forests play a crucial role in helping communities deal with the impacts of climate change. In addition to their air-purifying functions, trees aid in mitigating the urban heat island (UHI) effect, which exacerbates air pollution levels. Trees cool down urban areas by providing shade and releasing moisture through transpiration, thereby reducing ground-level ozone formation (McDonald et al., 2016). These cooling benefits are significant as cities face warmer summers and more frequent and intense heat waves. Furthermore, the cooling effect of trees can result in lower energy usage in buildings, indirectly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. For instance, research conducted in Montreal demonstrated that planting more trees along streets could significantly reduce the UHI effect, leading to lower temperatures and improved thermal comfort (Wang & Akbari, 2016).
Urban forests also contribute significantly to climate change mitigation by sequestering carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere and acting as carbon sinks. Canadian urban forests already store significant amounts of carbon (Pasher et al., 2014; McGovern & Pasher, 2016; Steenberg et al., 2023). Moreover, urban forests, as a natural climate solution, have the potential to sequester and store more carbon if the existing trees are managed effectively and new trees are planted strategically (Drever et al., 2021).
Carbon credit projects across Canada have promoted sustainable forest management, carbon sequestration, and biodiversity conservation. However, urban forest carbon credit programs are less prevalent in urban areas than in rural and boreal forest initiatives in Canada. In urban forests, due to limited space for tree growth, soil compaction, and pollution, which impact tree longevity, tree mortality, and ongoing carbon maintenance, urban forest carbon sequestration and storage present unique challenges. Urban forests have a relatively small biomass for carbon sequestration compared to rural forests. Additionally, the diverse ownership of urban forests and the high cost of investments associated with certification further complicate the process of generating substantial carbon offset credits from urban trees. However, the importance of carbon sequestration has been recognized, and urban forest carbon programs offer an opportunity to enhance urban sustainability and contribute to climate change mitigation. The Sustainable Forestry Initiative’s Urban and Community Forest Sustainability Standard and the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Certification standard can assist municipalities in developing frameworks that incorporate carbon storage into their urban forest management plans (SFI, 2024; FSC, n.d.). The City of Mississauga attained FSC® certification for its woodlands in 2024. In Canada, there are also localized, voluntary, and self-evaluated carbon offset programs for urban forests. These programs promote tree preservation and planting and carbon credits on a voluntary basis (University of Toronto, 2019).
Mitigation and Management Strategies
Maximizing these benefits requires effective urban forest management of the existing trees and strategic planning and implementation of tree planting. One critical component of planning future urban forests is appropriate tree species selection, as different species vary in their ability to contribute to air pollution removal and withstand changing climate conditions. Using climate analogues and vulnerability metrics to inform tree species selection ensures that urban forests remain resilient under future climate scenarios (Esperon-Rodriguez et al., 2022). Furthermore, integration of urban forest management into municipal climate policies can enhance the effectiveness of climate adaptation strategies. Aligning municipal climate change and urban forestry policies in Canadian cities can lead to more cohesive and robust adaptation frameworks that benefit both urban forest and climate change mitigation (Cheng et al., 2021).
Several Canadian municipalities have successfully implemented urban forestry initiatives to combat air quality issues and climate change. In Kingston, the impact of urban forests was critical in mitigating the UHI effect, improving thermal comfort, and reducing energy consumption for cooling (Guilbault, 2016). In Vancouver, local climate zones have been analyzed to optimize tree planting locations, ensuring that urban trees contribute effectively to maintaining outdoor thermal comfort (Aminipouri et al., 2019). This approach highlights the importance of local and site-specific strategies in urban forest planning. Moreover, the City of Surrey has developed a conversation guide to engage residents in urban heat readiness, emphasizing the role of urban trees in mitigating heatwaves and improving community resilience (City of Surrey, 2021).
Municipalities and industry professionals consider several vital recommendations to maximize the benefits of urban forests, including those related to air quality. Sustaining healthy large-stature trees and promoting a diverse mix of long-lived and low-maintenance tree species enhances resilience against pests, diseases, and thus climate change while providing a more comprehensive range of ecosystem services (Wood & Dupras, 2021). Moreover, identifying priority areas for tree planting, such as heat-prone neighbourhoods and high-traffic areas, can maximize air quality improvements and thermal comfort (Chan et al., 2007). Additionally, implementing more efficient tree care, such as watering during droughts, can support the health of trees and enhance their role in mitigating climate change effects. These efforts can be supported by involving local communities in urban forestry initiatives through education and participation programs; engaged residents are more likely to support and care for urban trees, which can supplement municipal tree care efforts and ensure urban forestry’s long-term success and sustainability (Bourque et al., 2021).
Finally, regular monitoring and maintenance programs are essential to ensure healthy and functional urban forests. Urban forests are indispensable assets for Canadian cities, offering significant benefits for improving air quality and mitigating climate change. By strategically managing and expanding urban tree cover, municipalities and industry professionals can enhance urban resilience, improve urban environments, and create more livable and resilient cities (Cheng et al., 2024).
Resources
Canadian National
- Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). (n.d.). Air quality.
- Climate Atlas of Canada. (n.d.). Urban Forests and Climate Change | Climate Atlas of Canada.
- Forest Gene Conservation Association (FGCA). (2024). Climate change – FGCA.
- Health Canada. (2020). Health impacts of traffic-related air pollution in Canada. Government of Canada.
- Health Canada. (2022). Health of Canadians in a Changing Climate — Advancing our Knowledge for Action.
- Health Canada. (2023). Health Impacts of Air Pollution in Canada 2021 Report.
- Natural Resources Canada. (2023). Climate change adaptation in Canada.
- Natural Resources Canada. (2024). Canada in a changing climate: Advancing our knowledge for action.
- Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). (n.d.). Forest Management Certification.
Canadian Provincial
Alberta
- Regional Aquatics Monitoring Program (RAMP). (n.d.). Climate Change and Emissions Management Act
British Columbia
- City of Surrey. (2021). Urban heat ready: A conversation guide for Surrey residents.
- Ministry of Environment and Climate Change. (2024). Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy
Manitoba
- Manitoba’s Climate Action Team. (2024). Home – Manitoba’s climate action team.
- Province of Manitoba. (n.d.). Province of Manitoba | Climate and Green Plan.
New Brunswick
- New Brunswick Environmental Network. (n.d.). RKI: Nature-Based Climate Change Solutions.
Newfoundland and Labrador
- Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. (2024). Environment and Climate Change – Government of Newfoundland and Labrador.
Nova Scotia
- Province of Nova Scotia. (2022). Nova Scotia’s climate change plan for clean growth. Department of Environment and Climate Change.
Ontario
- City of Toronto. (2024a). Green infrastructure resources.
- City of Toronto. (2024b). TransformTO Net Zero Strategy.
- Government of Ontario. (n.d.). A Made-in-Ontario environment plan.
- Province of Ontario. (n.d.). Managed forests and climate change.
- Regional Municipality of Durham. (2018). Keeping our cool: Managing urban heat islands in Durham region.
- University of Toronto. (2019). Low-Carbon Action Plan 2019-2024.
Prince Edward Island
- Government of Prince Edward Island. (n.d.). Climate change.
Quebec
- Gouvernement du Québec. (2012). 2013-2020 Government Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation.
- Gouvernement du Québec. (n.d.). Climate Change Adaptation Strategy.
Saskatchewan
- Government of Saskatchewan. (2017). Prairie Resilience: A Made-in-Saskatchewan Climate Change Strategy — Canada in a Changing Climate.
- Government of Saskatchewan. (n.d.). Saskatchewan’s Climate Change Strategy | Climate Resilience in Saskatchewan.
Non-Canadian
- Davey Institute. (n.d.). Hardiness zones map.
- Los Angeles Homes. (n.d.). Urban Heat Islands: The main issues and what is being done to combat them.
- Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI). (2024). SFI Urban and Community Forest Sustainability Standard.
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (n.d.). Northwest Urban Forests and Climate Change.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2024). Using trees and vegetation to reduce heat islands.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2024). Climate Change Indicators: Heat-Related Deaths.
Carbon Calculator Tools for Urban Forestry
- i-Tree. (n.d.). i-Tree Eco.
- Tree Canada. (n.d.). Carbon calculator.
- USDA Forest Service. (2024). CUFR Tree Carbon Calculator (CTCC).
Further Readings
- Aminipouri, M., Rayner, D., Lindberg, F., Thorsson, S., Knudby, A. J., Zickfeld, K., Middel, A., & Krayenhoff, E. S. (2019). Urban tree planting to maintain outdoor thermal comfort under climate change: The case of Vancouver’s local climate zones. Building and Environment, 158, 226–236.
- Benomar L, Bousquet J, Perron M, Beaulieu J and Lamara M (2022) Tree Maladaptation Under Mid-Latitude Early Spring Warming and Late Cold Spell: Implications for Assisted Migration. Front. Plant Science, 13, 920852.
- Brandt, L., Lewis, A. D., Fahey, R., Scott, L., Darling, L., & Swanston, C. (2016). A framework for adapting urban forests to climate change. Environmental Science & Policy, 66, 393–402.
- Chan, C. F., Lebedeva, J., Otero, J., & Richardson, G. (2007). Urban Heat Islands: A Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for Montreal. The Climate Change Action Partnership. McGill University School of Urban Planning.
- Cheng, Z., Nesbitt, L., Girling, C., Sheppard, S., Konijnendijk, C., & Nitoslawski, S. (2024). Urban density and the urban forest: How well are cities balancing them in the context of climate change? Cities, 149, 104962.
- Cheng, Z., Nitoslawski, S., Van Den Bosch, C. K., Sheppard, S., Nesbitt, L., & Girling, C. (2021). Alignment of municipal climate change and urban forestry policies: A Canadian perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, 122, 14–24.
- Drapeau, L.-M., Beaudoin, M., Vandycke, L., & Brunstein, M. (2021). Urban Heat Island Mitigation Strategies: 2021 Update.
- Drever, C. R., Cook-Patton, S. C., Akhter, F., Badiou, P. H., Chmura, G. L., Davidson, S. J., . . . Kurz, W. A. (2021). Natural climate solutions for Canada. Science Advances, 7(23).
- Esperon-Rodriguez, M., Ordoñez, C., Van Doorn, N. S., Hirons, A., & Messier, C. (2022). Using climate analogues and vulnerability metrics to inform urban tree species selection in a changing climate: The case for Canadian cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 228, 104578.
- Greene, C. S., & Millward, A. A. (2016). Getting closure: The role of urban forest canopy density in moderating summer surface temperatures in a large city. Urban Ecosystems, 20(1), 141–156.
- Greener Seasons. (2022). Tree Facts – Benefits of Urban Trees.
- Guilbault, S. (2016). KINGSTON: Using the urban forest to mitigate the urban heat island effect (pp. 59–62). The Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction.
- Guilbault, S., Kovacs, P., Berry, P., & Richardson, G. R. A. (Eds.). (2016). Cities adapt to extreme heat: celebrating local leadership.
- Hallett, R. A., Piana, M. R., Johnson, M. L., & Brandt, L. A. (2024). Climate change and urban forests. Elsevier eBooks (pp. 243–264).
- Health Canada. (2020). Reducing urban heat islands to protect health in Canada.
- Irga, P. J., Burchett, M. D., & Torpy, F. R. (2015). Does urban forestry have a quantitative effect on ambient air quality in an urban environment? Atmospheric Environment, 120, 173-181.
- Johnston, M. H., M. Campagna, P. Gray, H. Kope, J. Loo, A. Ogden, G.A. O’Neill, D. Price, & T. Williamson. (2009). Vulnerability of Canada’s tree species to climate change and Management Options for adaptation: An overview for policy makers and practitioners. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers.
- Kenley, M. (2022). Recommendations for municipalities: Focus on urban tree cover. Canadian Environmental Law Association.
- Khan, T., & Conway, T. M. (2020). Vulnerability of common urban forest species to projected climate change and practitioners’ perceptions and responses. Environmental Management, 65(4), 534–547.
- Livesley, S. J., McPherson, E. G., and Calfapietrac, C. (2016). The Urban Forest and Ecosystem Services: Impacts on Urban Water, Heat, and Pollution Cycles at the Tree, Street, and City Scale. Journal of Environmental Quality, 45(1), 119–124.
- McDonald, R., Kroeger, T., Boucher, T., Longzhu, W., Salem, R., Adams, J., Bassett, S., Edgecomb, M., & Snigda Garg. (2016). Planting Healthy Air: A global analysis of the role of urban trees in addressing particulate matter pollution and extreme heat. The Nature Conservancy.
- McGovern, M. and Pasher, J. (2016). Canadian urban tree canopy cover and carbon sequestration status and change 1990–2012. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 20(Supplement C), 227-232.
- Needoba, A., Porter, E., LeFrancois, C., Dobbs, C., Allen, J. B., Cox, T., & Coulthard, M. (2016). Urban Forest Climate Adaptation Framework for Metro Vancouver. Urban Forest Climate Adaptation Framework for Metro Vancouver.
- Nowak, D. J., & Heisler, G. M. (2010). Air quality effects of urban trees and parks. National Recreation and Park Association.
- Nowak, D. J., Hirabayashi, S., Doyle, M., McGovern, M., & Pasher, J. (2018). Air pollution removal by urban forests in Canada and its effect on air quality and human health. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 40–48.
- Ordóñez, C., & Duinker, P. N. (2015). Climate change vulnerability assessment of the urban forest in three Canadian cities. Climatic Change, 131(4), 531–543.
- Pasher, J., McGovern, M., Khoury, M. and Duffe, J. (2014). Assessing carbon storage and sequestration by Canada’s urban forests using high resolution earth observation data. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(3), 484-494.
- Ramsfield, T. D., Bentz, B., Faccoli, M., Jactel, H., & Brockerhoff, E. G. (2016). Forest health in a changing world: effects of globalization and climate change on forest insect and pathogen impacts. Forestry an International Journal of Forest Research, 89(3), 245–252.
- Sousa-Silva, R., Lambry, T., Cameron, E., Belluau, M., & Paquette, A. (2023). Urban forests – Different ownership translates to greater diversity of trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 88, 128084.
- Steenberg, J. W. N., Ristow, M., Duinker, P. N., Lapointe-Elmrabti, L., MacDonald, J. D., Nowak, D. J., Pasher, J., Flemming, C., & Samson, C. (2023). A national assessment of urban forest carbon storage and sequestration in Canada. Carbon Balance and Management, 18(1).
- Thomas, B. R., Stoehr, M., Schreiber, S. G., Benowicz, B., Schroeder, W. R., Soolanayakanahally, … Kort, J. (2024). Tree Improvement in Canada – past, present and future, 2023 and beyond. The Forestry Chronicle, 100(1).
- Tischenko, L., Williams, M., DeMerchant, I., Sambaraju, K., Zacharias, M., Soolanayakanahally, R., …Porth, I. (2024). Oak genomics for nature-based solutions: shaping future forests and resilient landscapes in Canada. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 20(3).
- Vahmani, P., Jones, A.D. & Li, D. (2022). Will Anthropogenic Warming Increase Evapotranspiration? Examining Irrigation Water Demand Implications of Climate Change in California. Earth’s Future, 10(1), e2021EF002221.
- Vallet, P. (2005). Impact de différentes stratégies sylvicoles sur la fonction ”puits de carbone” des peuplements forestiers – Modélisation et simulation à l’échelle de la parcelle. Life Sciences [q-bio]. ENGREF (AgroParisTech).
- Wang, Y., & Akbari, H. (2016). The effects of street tree planting on Urban Heat Island mitigation in Montreal. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 122–128.
- Wieditz, I., & Penney, J. (2007). Climate change adaptation options for Toronto’s urban forest. In The Clean Air Partnership. Clean Air Partnership.
- Wood, S., & Dupras, J. (2021). Increasing functional diversity of the urban canopy for climate resilience: Potential tradeoffs with ecosystem services? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58, 126972.
- Zupancic, T., Westmacott, C., & Bulthuis, M. (2015). The impact of green space on heat and air pollution in urban communities: A meta-narrative systematic review. David Suzuki Foundation.