Benefits of Urban Forests
Bardekjian, A. & Puric-Mladenovic, D. (2025). Benefits of Urban Forests. In Growing Green Cities: A Practical Guide to Urban Forestry in Canada. Tree Canada. Retrieved from Tree Canada: https://treecanada.ca/urban-forestry-guide/benefits-of-urban-forests/

Highlights
Ecological and economic value
Urban forests regulate climate, improve air quality, support biodiversity, and provide economic benefits.
Climate and urban sustainability
Canadian cities are expanding urban forests to combat climate change, enhance health, and improve livability.
Quantifying urban forest benefits
Canadian municipalities use a range of tools to assess urban forest structure, map ecological services, and guide decision-making.
Urban trees, individually or collectively as urban forests, provide diverse ecological services, some of which can be monetized and provide economic value to society. Ecological services of urban forests, in general, include regulating, provisioning, supporting, and cultural services (Filho et al., 2020). Urban forest regulating services have the ability to moderate the environment via climate regulation, flood control, air pollution removal, and carbon storage. Provisioning services provide tangible products such as food, water, wood, and medicinal plants (Visentin, 2019). Supporting services are natural processes that sustain life, including nutrient cycling, soil creation, biodiversity, habitat, oxygen production, photosynthesis, biomass production, erosion control, and the water cycle (Przewoźna, 2022). For example, urban forests support biodiversity through pollination and seed dispersal, and provide wildlife habitats for birds, mammals, and invertebrate species (FAOUN, 2022; Pickett et al., 2016). Cultural services of urban forests benefit humans when they directly or indirectly interact with trees. Compared to regulating, provisioning, and supporting services, cultural services are often harder to quantify and monetize, yet they improve the quality of human life by providing aesthetic, recreational, and restorative values (NWF, n.d.). The practice of urban forestry, which includes management and planning associated with maintaining and protecting urban forests and green spaces, also supports a steady flow of ecological services to society (Tree Canada, 2019; Salmond et al., 2016). It also provides economic benefits in terms of job creation, reduced infrastructure maintenance, and other direct and indirect benefits (Filho et al., 2020).
Climate & Urban Sustainability
With rising concerns about climate instability and government commitments to environmental sustainability and biodiversity conservation, urban forests and urban green spaces are being recognized as natural climate solutions and integral tools for improving the quality of life in urban areas. With nearly 75% of Canadians living in urban/metropolitan areas (StatCan, 2022), integrated land use planning and urban forest management efforts are required to maintain the quality of urban life and city livability in the face of climate change and environmental challenges.
As the negative impacts of climate change, urban sprawl, and intensified development continue to grow, public awareness of environmental issues is also on the rise. Many people recognize the importance of urban forests and the ecological services they provide. As a result, urban forestry has become a prominent topic in discussions related to municipal policy and decision-making across Canada. Recognizing these challenges and the need to increase urban forest cover to obtain the benefits that trees provide, Canadian cities have set some of the most ambitious urban forest canopy goals. For example, many major Canadian cities, including Vancouver, Halifax, Montreal, Ottawa, and Winnipeg, have pledged to increase urban tree canopy cover by more than 25% by 2030 (CCI, 2021), and Toronto has set an ambitious 40% target by 2050. For example, with over 11.5 million trees and around 1,500 urban parks and green spaces, Toronto has been integrating urban forest into urban land use fabric with an aim to become one of the most forested cities in Canada (City of Toronto, 2024; City of Toronto, n.d.).
The benefits of urban forests across various land uses and green spaces are far-reaching in Toronto. According to multiple health indicators, notably cardiovascular and respiratory health (StatCan, 2019), Toronto is one of the healthiest cities in Canada. Other Canadian cities, such as Ottawa, Winnipeg, and Metro Vancouver, are also developing and implementing management, operations, maintenance, and protection strategies to manage urban green spaces and receive the full benefits of urban forests and green spaces. Ecological services provided by urban forests and green spaces have been shown to vastly improve the quality of life in urban areas by also improving mental health and promoting social cohesion (Tree Canada, 2019). Epidemiological studies have shown that even brief experiences in natural settings can reduce neural activity in the subgenual prefrontal cortex, indicating a reduction in feelings of stress and anxiety (Bratman et al., 2015). When congruent experiments were conducted in urban areas lacking nature, the same effects were not observed (Bratman et al., 2015). Medical studies highlight urban naturalized areas and green space as essential for enhancing mental health in urban environments (Astell-Burt & Feng, 2019; Rugel, Carpiano, Henderson & Brauer, 2019). A direct link has also been drawn between tree canopy cover and social capital, where urban neighbourhoods with more tree cover have more social networks and a greater sense of cohesion, and also further benefit from improved mental health (Holtan, Dieterlan & Sullivan, 2014).
When access to treed green spaces is available, Canadians tend to use them, increasing the likelihood of social interaction while encouraging diverse recreation activities across all demographic spectrums (Koley, Kuo & Sullivan, 1997). Proximity and availability of green space within urban areas encourage physical activity, which further benefits the mental health of urban residents while improving general indicators of physical health (FAOUN, 2022). Greener urban areas have shown a positive association with better cardiovascular health, lower blood pressure, reduced incidences of obesity, asthma and diabetes, and improved memory and attention span (Richardson et al., 2013; Pretty et al., 2006; Kim, Lee & Ramos, 2021; Tree Canada, 2024; Kardan et al., 2015).
In addition, urban trees are also crucial biofilters because they capture atmospheric pollutants and particulates in city air, keep the air cleaner, and reduce the severity of respiratory-related conditions and illnesses (Wolf et al., 2020). Urban trees in Canada are responsible for sequestering and neutralizing around 2.5 million metric tonnes of atmospheric carbon every year (Steenberg et al., 2023). Trees can reduce ambient temperatures by 2-5 degrees Celsius in urbanized areas, combating negative health outcomes related to high temperatures in summer months (NRCan, 2016).
Quantifying Urban Forest Benefits
Urban areas with extensive and diverse green spaces and strong urban forestry practices benefit from increased urban forest ecological services (FAOUN, 2022). Overall, urban forests across cities in Canada provide various benefits, and many municipalities have quantified and mapped urban forest services (i-Tree, 2024; Town of Oakville, 2016). Urban forest inventory and monitoring are a foundational step toward quantifying urban forests and the benefits they provide. Depending on the method and tools used, it is possible to estimate and quantify urban forest services and track them over time by utilizing urban canopy mapping, tree species measurements, and tree health data.
One such tool used for estimating ecological services is i-TreeEco, developed by the USDA Forest Service. i-Tree provides forestry analysis tools at the level of individual trees to entire stands, benefits assessment tools, and a database to support quantifying forest structure and guide decision-making (i-Tree, n.d.). i-Tree has been used across over 20 municipalities in Canada to estimate ecological services (i-Tree, n.d.).
Resources
Canadian National
- Alexander, C. & DePratto, B. (2014). The Value of Urban Forests in the Cities Across Canada (report). TD Economics.
- Canadian Climate Institute (CCI). (2021). Case Study:Growing Forests in a City.
- Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2024). Canada’s 2030 Nature Strategy: Halting and Reversing Biodiversity Loss in Canada. Gatineau: Government of Canada.
- Green Municipal Fund, Tree Canada. (n.d.). Webinar recording: The business case for planting trees.
- Hotte, N., Nesbitt, L., Barron, S., Cowan, J., and Cheng, C. Z. (2015). The social and economic values of Canada’s urban forests: A national synthesis. Vancouver: UBC Faculty of Forestry.
- i-Tree. (2024). International Reports (by nation) – Canada.
- Natural Resources Canada. (2022). The state of Canada’s forests: Annual report 2019 – Urban Forests.
- Natural Resources Canada. (2016). The State of Canada’s Forests – Annual Report 2016.
- Tree Canada. (2019). Canadian Urban Forestry Strategy 2019-2024.
- Tree Canada. (n.d.). Canadian Urban Forest Network.
Canadian Provincial
Alberta
- City of Edmonton. (2024). Urban Forestry Operations.
- City of Edmonton. (n.d.). Trees and Urban Forestry.
- CTV News. (2024). How Edmonton’s city design changes the impact of heat waves.
British Colombia
- City of Surrey. (2021). Urban heat ready: A conversation guide for Surrey residents.
- City of Vancouver. (n.d). Vancouver’s urban forest.
- City of Vancouver. (n.d.). Parks, forestry & recreation.
- Guse, B., Downing, S., Zhang, J., Rahmati, H., & Brian, C. (n.d.). How street trees can save our cities. Open Case Studies, University of British Columbia. Retrieved January 12, 2025, from
Manitoba
- Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society – Manitoba chapter. (2021). Caring for Urban Forests: Why Trees Matter.
- Manitoba Urban Forest Council. (n.d.). Urban Forestry Resources.
- Province of Manitoba. (n.d.). A Made-in-Manitoba Climate and Green Plan: Hearing from Manitobans.
- Province of Manitoba. (n.d.). Urban Forestry in Manitoba.
New Brunswick
- City of Fredericton. (n.d.). Fredericton Urban Forest Management Strategy interactive story map.
- Government of New Brunswick. (n.d.). Forestry and Conservation.
Newfoundland & Labrador
- City of St. John’s. (n.d.). Planning and Development – Landscaping and Urban Forest.
- Nature Newfoundland & Labrador. (2020). Urban forests and climate change in Newfoundland.
Nova Scotia
- Shape your City Halifax. (n.d.). Urban Forest Management Plan.
Ontario
- Alexander, C. & DePratto, B. (2014). Urban Forests: The Value of Trees in the City of Toronto. TD Economics.
- City of Guelph. (2019). City Of Guelph Urban Forest Study Report.
- Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition. (2016). Communicating the benefits of the urban forest in a municipal context: Toolkit part I.
- Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition. (2021). About Urban Forests.
- Kardan, O., Gozdyra, P., Misic, B. et al. (2015). Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center. Scientific Reports,5:11610.
- KBM Resources Group, Lallemand Inc./BioForest, Dillon Consulting Limited. (2016). Toronto Tree Canopy Study. City of Toronto.
- Ontario Urban Forest Council. (n.d.). Overview.
- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. (2011a). City of Mississauga Urban Forest Study: Technical Report.
- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. (2011b). Peel Region Urban Forest Strategy.
- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. (2014). Town of Aurora Urban Forest Study: Technical Report.
- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. (2022a). Ajax Urban Forest Study: Technical Report.
- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. (2022b). Markham Forest Study: Technical Report.
- Town of Oakville. (2016). Growing Livability: A comprehensive study of Oakville’s urban forest. i-Tree.
Prince Edward Island
- CBC News. (2023). Charlottetown experiments with mini forests to speed up growth.
- Government of Prince Edward Island. (n.d.). Climate change.
- Harris, H. (2023). Reforesting Prince Edward Island.
Quebec
- Gouvernement du Québec. (n.d.). Climate Change Adaptation Strategy.
- Tree Canada. (n.d.). Montreal Urban Canopy Project.
- Ville de Montréal. (2024). Montréal mini-forests.
Saskatchewan
- City of Saskatoon. (n.d.). Saskatoon’s Urban Forest.
- Government of Saskatchewan. (n.d.). Saskatchewan’s Climate Change Strategy – Climate Resilience in Saskatchewan.
Non-Canadian
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2022). Urban forestry and urban greening in drylands – Improving resilience, health, and wellbeing of urban communities: A background document for the Green Urban Oases Programme. Rome.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). Urban Forests: A global perspective.
- i-Tree. (n.d.). About & Tools Info web pages.
Further Reading
- Astell-Burt, T., Feng, X. (2019). Association of Urban Green Space with Mental Health and General Health Among Adults in Australia. JAMA Network Open, 2(7), e198209. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8209
- Bratman, G.N., Hamilton, J.P., Hahn, K.S., Daily, G.C., Gross, J.J. (2015). Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 112(28), 8567-72.
- Coley, R., Kuo, M., and Sullivan, W. (1997). Where Does Community Grow? The Social Context Created by Nature in Urban Public Housing. Environment and Behavior, 29, 468-494.
- Druckenmiller, H. (2022). Accounting for ecosystem service values in climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 12, 596–598.
- Druckenmiller, H (2023), “Estimating an economic value of forests: Evidence from tree mortality in the American West”, Technical Report.
- Ejiagha, I.R., Ahmed, M.R., Dewan, A, et al. (2022). Urban Warming of the Two Most Populated Cities in the Canadian Province of Alberta, and Its Influencing Factors. Sensors22(8), 2894.
- Filho, W. L., Barbir, J., Sima, M., Kalbus, A., Nagy, G. J., Paletta, A., . . . Bonoli, A. (2020). Reviewing the role of ecosystems services in the sustainability of the urban environment: A multi-country analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121338.
- Han, L., Heblich, S.,Timmins, C., and Zylberberg, Y. (2023), Cool Cities: The Value of Green Infrastructure. NBER Working Paper 32063.
- Holtan, M., Dieterlen, S., and Sullivan, W. (2014). Social Life Under Cover: Tree Canopy and Social Capital in Baltimore, Maryland. Environment and Behavior, 47, 1-24.
- Kim, J., Lee, S., and Ramos, W. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Accessibility of Green Space and Adult Obesity Rates: A Secondary Data Analysis in the United States. Journal of Preventative Medicine and Public Health, 54(3),208-217.
- Livesly, S.J., McPherson, E.G. & Calfapietra, C. (2016). The Urban Forest and Ecosystem Services: Impacts on Urban Water, Heat, and Pollution Cycles at the Tree, Street, and City Scale. Journal of Environmental Quality, 45(1), 119-124.
- Nesbitt, L., Hotte, N., Barron, S., Cowan, J., Sheppard, S.R.J. (2017). The social and economic value of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban forests in North America: A review and suggestions for future research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 25, 103-111.
- ParaSpace. (2021). Urban Forests – What are they and how do they benefit us?
- Pickett, S.T.A., M.L. Cadenasso, D.L. Childers, M.J. McDonnell, and W. Zhou. 2016. Evolution and future of urban ecological science: ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 2(7), e01229.
- Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15(5), 319–337.
- Przewoźna, P., Mączka, K., Mielewczyk, M. et al. (2022). Ranking ecosystem services delivered by trees in urban and rural areas. Ambio, 51(9),2043-2057.
- Richardson, E. A., Pearce, J., Mitchell, R., ans Kingham, S. (2013). Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health. Public Health, 127(4),318-324.
- Rollins, R. (2008). City of Nanaimo Urban Forest Study – City Trees and You: Results of Public Opinion Survey. City of Nanaimo.
- Rugel, E. J., Carpiano, R. M., Henderson, S. B., & Brauer, M. (2019). Exposure to natural space, sense of community belonging, and adverse mental health outcomes across an urban region. Environmental Research, 171, 365–377.
- Salmond, J.A., Tadaki, M., Vardoulakis, S. et al. (2016). Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment. Environmental Health, 15(Suppl 1), S36.
- Statistics Canada. (2019). Canadian Community Health Survey: Public use microdata file, 2015/2016.
- Statistics Canada. (2022). Canada’s large urban centres continue to grow and spread.
- Steenberg, J.W.N., Ristow, M., Duinker, P.N. et al. (2023). A national assessment of urban forest carbon storage and sequestration in Canada. Carbon Balance and Management,18(11).
- van den Bosch, M. (2017). Impacts of urban forests on physical and mental health and wellbeing. In: Ferrini, F., Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. C. & Alessio, F. (eds). Routledge handbook of urban forestry. Routledge: New York. 82-95. Chapter 6. ISBN 9781315627106.
- Visentin, J. (2019). Urban Food Forestry (UFF), its Role in Canadian Urban Forestry Management Plans, and Integration into Thunder Bay, Ontario. Thesis submitted to Lakehead University.
- Wolf, K.L., Lam, S.T., McKeen, J.K., et al. (2020). Urban Trees and Human Health: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12),4371.
- Wolf, K. L. (2017). Social aspects of urban forestry and metro nature. In: Ferrini, F., Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. C. & Alessio, F. (eds). Routledge handbook of urban forestry. Routledge: New York. 65-81. Chapter 5. ISBN 9781315627106.
- Ziter, C.D., Pedersen, E.J., Kucharik, C.J., and Turner, M.G. (2019). Scale-dependent interactions between tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces reduce daytime urban heat during summer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(15) 7575-7580,