Stormwater Management
Bardekjian, A. & Puric-Mladenovic, D. (2025). Stormwater Management. In Growing Green Cities: A Practical Guide to Urban Forestry in Canada. Tree Canada. Retrieved from Tree Canada: https://treecanada.ca/urban-forestry-guide/stormwater-management/

Highlights
Stormwater runoff and urbanization
Impermeable surfaces in cities cause excessive stormwater runoff, increasing flood risks and infrastructure damage.
Role of urban forests
Trees help restore natural water cycles by intercepting rainfall, stabilizing soil, and improving water absorption.
Stormwater management strategies
Expanding and improving urban tree canopy cover and soft surfaces is an effective way to reduce runoff and manage stormwater.
Urbanization and intensive land development have significantly changed the permeability of urban landscapes and impacted their natural hydrological cycles and processes. Cities are becoming more vulnerable to heavy rainfall events that result in rapid runoff and flooding (Kaykhosravi et al., 2020). With fewer natural forests and less natural vegetation, any reduction in tree canopy cover results in increased runoff and urban areas becoming more prone to flooding. Urban forests, with adequate canopy cover, structure, and composition, have the potential to improve urban hydrology and reduce runoff (Berland et al., 2018; Kuehler, Hathaway & Tirpak, 2017; Xiao, McPherson, Simpson & Ustin, 1998). However, to effectively manage urban forests for improving hydrology, many cities and towns globally lack appropriate areas for future tree planting. Canadian urban areas are no exception when it comes to these issues of urbanization, hydrology, and tree canopy.
Trees, individually and collectively as urban forests, play a crucial role in stormwater management. Strategically conserved, managed, and enhanced urban forests can provide a sustainable solution for Canadian municipalities experiencing environmental challenges. Urban trees and their canopies manage stormwater through evapotranspiration and by physically intercepting rainfall via leaves, branches, and tree trunks, thus reducing the volume of water that reaches the ground (Carlyle-Moses et al., 2020; Dowtin et al., 2023). However, interception and evapotranspiration are determined by morphological characteristics of tree species, tree size and stature, leaf area density, branching structure, and whether trees are planted in groups or individually (Berland et al., 2018; Kuehler, Hathaway & Tirpak, 2017; Xiao, McPherson, Simpson & Ustin, 1998).
Additionally, tree roots stabilize the soil, improve soil structure and organic content, and increase the soil’s ability to absorb and filter water. This reduces the load on stormwater management infrastructure, streams, and ponds, and lessens flood risks while mitigating erosion and sedimentation in waterways (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2023). Urban trees also improve overall water quality (The Mersey Forest, 2014) by reducing runoff and toxic chemicals like metals, fuels, solvents, and other pollutants (USEPA, 2013). Urban forests with hydrological functions help protect properties and gray urban infrastructure by reducing flooding and runoff during extreme weather events, which provides significant economic benefits (Nesbitt et al., 2017).
Many Canadian cities have created green development standards to incorporate trees and integrate urban forests into land use planning (see City of Toronto, 2023b; City of Mississauga, 2012; The Town of Halton Hills, 2019). By preserving and managing urban trees, municipalities reduce overall runoff from rainfall and increase soil absorption capacity, thus creating a more resilient urban environment, urban forest, and natural ecosystem (City of Mississauga, 2023; Ministry of Municipal Affairs, 2023).
Implementation Strategies
One of the most effective strategies for managing stormwater and reducing runoff is to increase both the coverage and quality of tree canopy. This can be accomplished by strategically planting trees in areas such as streets, parks, private properties, and various types of land use. To further enhance the advantages of urban forests, it is recommended to combine tree canopy conservation and planting with other forms of green infrastructure, such as rain gardens, green roofs, and permeable pavements. This integrated approach can significantly improve stormwater management and maximize the benefits provided by urban forests (Carlyle-Moses et al., 2020; USEPA, 2024).
More recently in Canada, various levels of government have been encouraging urban tree planting to increase canopy cover and improve urban environmental conditions, as well as to improve stormwater management (Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition, 2016; City of Toronto, 2023a; City of Toronto, 2023b). To that effect, many Canadian municipalities have set goals or guidelines for stormwater management that utilize urban forests and increase tree canopy cover. For example, as per Toronto’s Green Standard Requirements, the City of Toronto aims to minimize runoff to at least 50 percent of its annual rainfall and, for some sites, retain at least 5 mm of rainfall (through rainwater reuse, on-site infiltration, and evapotranspiration) from each rainfall event (City of Toronto, 2017). Aside from the various ecosystem services urban forests provide, urban trees also enable the saving of resources for managing gray infrastructure. The City of Surrey, for example, saved $4.8 million/year on stormwater infrastructure due to the presence of trees (City of Surrey & Urban Systems, 2023). Some municipalities, such as the City of Mississauga and the City of Kitchener, have implemented stormwater fees to encourage private landowners to reduce the hard surface on their properties. The fees are based on a percentage of impervious surfaces to encourage property owners to use green infrastructure and permeable surfaces to reduce localized runoff (Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, 2016).
Resources
Canadian National
- Canadian Standards Association Group. (2022). The Municipal How to Guide for CSA Community Water Standards. In CSA Community Water Standards.
- Clean Air Partnership (CAP). (2019). Sample Green Development Standards Metrics and Comparison Tables.
- Depave Paradise. (2025). Projects – Check the calendar below to find Depave Paradise events near you.
- Green Communities Canada. (2017a). Soak It Up! Toolkit: 16 Actions Your Municipality Can Take to Reduce Runoff and Runoff Pollution (2nd ed.). Rain Community Solutions.
- Green Communities Canada. (2017b). Stormwater Scorecard: What Canadian communities are doing to reduce stormwater runoff and runoff pollution. Rain Community Solutions.
- Green Municipal Fund. (n.d.). Helping municipalities create a sustainable and prosperous future.
- Horizon Advisors, Rous, T., Camacho, L., Batarseh, R., Asadollahi, A., & Preston, S. (2019). Benefits of adopting natural infrastructure: A comparison of natural and grey infrastructure solutions.
- Tree Canada (2024). Canadian Urban Forest Network.
Canadian Provincial
Alberta
- City of Calgary. (2023). City of Calgary Stormwater Management Strategy. Alberta Low Impact Development Partnership (ALIDP).
- Province of Alberta. (1999). Stormwater Management Guidelines for the Province of Alberta – Open Government.
British Colombia
- City of Surrey & Urban Systems. (2023). Urban Forest Management Strategy.
- City of Vancouver. (n.d.). Citywide Integrated Rainwater Management Plan.
- City of Victoria. (n.d.). Stormwater Management.
Manitoba
- Government of Manitoba. (n.d.). Manitoba’s Water Management Strategy. Environment and Climate Change.
New Brunswick
- City of Saint John. (2016). City of Saint John Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual.
- Government of New Brunswick. (2021). Integrated Watershed Management Plan for the Shediac Bay Watershed (2021-2031).
- OPUS International Consultants (Canada) Limited. (2017). Village of New Maryland Storm Water Management Master Plan.
- The City of Saint John. (n.d.). Stormwater and drainage.
- Town of Hampton. (2019). Stormwater Management Guidelines.
Newfoundland and Labrador
- Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. (2024). Water Resources Management. Environment and Climate Change.
- Town of Torbay & Progressive Engineering & Consulting Incorporated (PEC). (2019). Town of Torbay – Stormwater Management Plan.
Northwest Territories
- Government of Northwest Territories. (n.d.). Water stewardship in the NWT. Environment and Climate Change.
Nova Scotia
- Government of Nova Scotia. (n.d.). Nova Scotia Surface water. Environment and Climate Change.
Ontario
- City of Mississauga. (2012). Green Development Standards – Going Green in Mississauga.
- City of Mississauga. (2023). Build Beautiful: Stormwater Master Plan.
- City of Toronto. (2017). Toronto Green Streets Technical Guidelines (GSTG).
- City of Toronto. (2023a). Stormwater management programs & projects.
- City of Toronto. (2023b). Toronto Green Standard.
- Environmental Commissioner of Ontario (ECO). (2016). Urban stormwater fees: How to pay for what we need.
- Government of Ontario. (2003). Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual.
- Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition. (2016). Ontario’s urban forests call to action.
- Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) (2022). Technical guidelines for stormwater management submissions.
- Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority, & AECOM. (2010). Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Stormwater Management Guidelines.
- The City of Waterloo. (n.d.). Volume 6 – Stormwater management.
- The Town of Halton Hills. (2019). Green Development Standard.
- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA). (2019). Stormwater Management – Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA).
- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) & Credit Valley Conservation Authority. (2010). Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Planning and Design Guide.
- Town of Caledon & Sustainability Solutions Group (SSG). (2024). Green Development Standard Guidebook.
Quebec
- Gouvernement du Québec. (n.d.). Rainwater management. Ministère De L’Environnement, De La Lutte Contre Les Changements Climatiques, De La Faune Et Des Parcs.
- Ministry of Municipal Affairs. (2023). Local Government Stormwater Infrastructure – Province of British Columbia.
Saskatchewan
- City of Saskatoon. (n.d.-a). Pathway to a Sustainable Urban Forest: Implementation of the Urban Forest Management Plan 2022-2031.
- City of Saskatoon. (n.d.-b). Urban Forest Management Plan. In City of Saskatoon – Urban Foresty Management Plan (pp. 3–45).
- Government of Saskatchewan. (2015). Stormwater guidelines. Publications Centre.
Non-Canadian
- Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. (2023). Drought and Climate Change.
- Center for Urban Forest Research. (2003). Is all your rain going down the drain? The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
- Davey Resource Group & U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Stormwater to Street Trees: Engineering urban forests for stormwater management. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
- Global Communications Team. (2019). Biodiversity in cities: How natural asset mapping helps cities protect livelihoods and address climate change impacts – CityTalk. ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability.
- The Mersey Forest. (2014). Urban Catchment Forestry: the strategic use of urban trees and woodlands to reduce flooding, improve water quality, and bring wider benefits.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2023a). Using trees and vegetation to reduce heat islands.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2023b). Soak up the rain: Trees help reduce runoff.
Further Reading
- Bartens, J., Day, S. D., Harris, J. R., Dove, J. E., & Wynn, T. M. (2008). Can Urban Tree Roots Improve Infiltration through Compacted Subsoils for Stormwater Management? Journal of Environmental Quality, 37(6), 2048-2057.
- Carlyle-Moses, D. E. (2012). Trees as green infrastructure in our cities.
- Carlyle-Moses, D. E., Livesley, S., Baptista, M. D., Thom, J., & Szota, C. (2020). Urban Trees as Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Mitigation and Use. In D. F. Levia, D. E. Carlyle-Moses, S. i. Iida, B. Michalzik, K. Nanko, & A. Tischer (Eds.), Forest-Water Interactions (pp. 397-432). Springer International Publishing.
- Carlyle-Moses, D. E., & Schooling, J. T. (2015). Tree traits and meteorological factors influencing the initiation and rate of stemflow from isolated deciduous trees. Hydrological Processes, 29(18), 4083-4099.
- Dowtin, A. L., Cregg, B. C., Nowak, D. J., and Levia, D. F. (2023). Towards optimized runoff reduction by urban tree cover: A review of key physical tree traits, site conditions, and management strategies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 239, 104849.
- Frosi, M. H., Kargar, M., Jutras, P., Prasher, S. O., & Clark, O. G. (2019). Street Tree Pits as Bioretention Units: Effects of Soil Organic Matter and Area Permeability on the Volume and Quality of Urban Runoff. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 230(7), 152.
- Garg, M., CaterinaValeo, Gupta, R., Prasher, S., Sharma, N. R., & Constabel, P. (2018). Integrating natural and engineered remediation strategies for water quality management within a low-impact development (LID) approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(29), 29304-29313.
- Green Communities Canada. (2017c). Urban Flooding in Ontario: Towards Collective Impact Solutions. Rain Community Solutions.
- Green Communities Canada, Living Cities Canada Fund. (2023). Living Cities Canada Fund 2023 Impact Report.
- Kaykhosravi, S., Khan, U. T., & Jadidi, M. A. (2020). The effect of climate change and urbanization on the demand for low impact development for three Canadian cities. Water, 12(5), 1280.
- Kirnbauer, M. C., Baetz, B. W., & Kenney, W. A. (2013). Estimating the stormwater attenuation benefits derived from planting four monoculture species of deciduous trees on vacant and underutilized urban land parcels. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(3), 401-407.
- Kuehler, E., Hathaway, J., & Tirpak, A. (2017). Quantifying the benefits of urban forest systems as a component of the green infrastructure stormwater treatment network. Ecohydrology, 10(3), e1813.
- Nesbitt, L., Hotte, N., Barron, S., Cowan, J., & Sheppard, S. R. J. (2017). The social and economic value of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban forests in North America: A review and suggestions for future research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 25, 103-111.
- O’Neill, S. (2018). Measuring Urban Forest Canopy Effects on Stormwater Runoff in Guelph, Ontario. University of Guelph.
- Orta-Ortiz, M.S. and Geneletti, D. (2022). What variables matter when designing nature-based solutions for stormwater management? A review of impacts on ecosystem services. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95, 106802.
- R. Bean, R. E. P., J. Voorhees and M. Elliott. (2021). Urban Tree Rainfall Interception Measurement and Modeling in WinSLAMM, the Source Loading and Management Model. Journal of Water Management Modeling, 29.
- Schooling, J. T., & Carlyle-Moses, D. E. (2015). The influence of rainfall depth class and deciduous tree traits on stemflow production in an urban park. Urban Ecosystems, 18(4), 1261-1284.
- Van Stan, J. T., Norman, Z., Meghoo, A., Friesen, J., Hildebrandt, A., Côté, J.-F., Underwood, S. J., Maldonado, G. (2017). Edge-to-Stem Variability in Wet-Canopy Evaporation from an Urban Tree Row. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 165(2), 295-310.
- Xiao, Q., McPherson, E. G., Simpson J, R. and Ustin, S. L. (1998). Rainfall Interception by Sacramento’s Urban Forest. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 24(4) 235-244.